Introduction
Dear friends of Muad’Dib,
We hope this finds you well, in good spirit and having a good day.
The purpose of this website is to serve as the official outlet for news regarding Muad’Dib’s arrest and trial, and also to appeal for your participation in putting another nail in the coffin of the so-called N.W.O. which only Muad’Dib (on Earth) knows how to defeat forever.
As many of you will know, Muad’Dib is the producer of the film "7/7 Ripple Effect", and He was arrested in Ireland for the “crime” of sending DVD’s of the film to the judge and jury of the first trial of three men: Waheed Ali, 25, Sadeer Saleem, 28, and Mohammed Shakil, 32, who were being tried at Kingston Crown Court, England, wrongfully accused of helping the four designated patsies of the London 7/7/2005 bombings who were; in reality; victims, as much as all the others who died and/or were injured and traumatized that day.
Muad’Dib has been falsely and hypocritically accused of “attempting to pervert the course of justice”, when the film; and the act of sending copies of it to those in charge of delivering a verdict; are all about STRAIGHTENING the course of justice, which the U.K. authorities are perverting.
Sending proof of someone's innocence should NEVER be a crime.
LLTF (Long Live The Fighters [For God/Good]),
The Fremen (Freemen).
Please click on the links below to read and find out more.
- Who is Muad'Dib?
- Reasons why the “Elite” fear Muad’Dib, other than 7/7 Truth.
- Chronology of events relating to Muad’Dib’s arrest and trial.
- Mentions in the Media
- 7/7 Ripple Effect
- What can I do to help?
Not How One Submits Evidence. Unfortunately,... GUILTY.
This is NOT the way in which one enters evidence into criminal proceedings. I must even wonder as to
your motive. You would have to, I imagine, be aware that - at best - you cause a mistrial due to jurors having been
exposed to your production here. What you have done is taken what you may be 100% correct in
labelling as "evidence", then encased it in a dramatic presentation based on the assumptions you've made.
No matter how right you might be; no matter how factual some of the elements within might be; and no matter how pertinent to the case those bare facts may be, the fact remains. You committed a crime.
More importantly, you may have risked even further the outcome for the defendants - assuming, as you claim, that they are innocent.
7/7 was a F/F